See the whole system learn.
Combine role results, implementation readiness, protected aggregate evidence, qualitative stakeholder themes, plan alignment, workload, and guardrail status—without turning a score into a verdict.
A decision aid with visible assumptions.
This index is synthetic. Districts define the measure, validate the baseline, approve weights, inspect subgroup effects, and retain the underlying evidence.
of 100 — not a ranking or forecast
Strengthen transition, attendance support, and reading-to-evidence routines through human-validated school/community context.
Formula: Σ(signal value × published weight) ÷ 100. All four values are synthetic implementation assumptions and are not actual school outcomes.
Suppression, complementary suppression, query controls, and export review apply before any subgroup display.
Learning transitions · synthetic example
All scenarios are fictional. No actual school performance values or verified school groupings are displayed.
Hear the theme—and keep the dissent.
AI may draft a theme. School teams verify it, central office reviews privacy/equity, and affected stakeholders validate the aggregate interpretation.
Emerging theme
Students want short, visible milestones and encouragement that explains why a resource was recommended.
What the majority summary must not erase
Some students prefer private progress and fewer adult reminders; Support Circle settings must stay student-visible.
Every action earns its place in the plan.
Alignment is to published sources and local authorized plans; the prototype does not claim district adoption.
Strategic priority
Student achievement; safe/supportive environment; talent; governance/alignment; family/community partnership.
Needs assessment
Public evidence, stakeholder voice, resources, barriers, and human-validated root cause.
ACIP / SIP goal
Specific objective, evidence-based action, owner, resource, date, and key measure.
Guardrail + review
Privacy, equity, accessibility, human approval, workload, appeal, incident, and retest.